Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Journal of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care ; 7(3):166-169, 2020.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2259973

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is a challenge for all health care providers (HCPs). Anesthesiologists are vulnerable to acquiring the disease during aerosol-generating procedures in operating theater and intensive care units. High index of suspicion, detailed history including travel history, strict hand hygiene, use of face masks, and appropriate personal protective equipment are some ways to minimize the risk of exposure to disease. Neurologic manifestations of COVID-19, modification of anesthesia regimen based on the procedure performed, and HCP safety are some implications relevant to a neuroanesthesiologist. National and international guidelines, recommendations, and position statements help in risk stratification, prioritization, and scheduling of neurosurgery and neurointervention procedures. Institutional protocols can be formulated based on the guidelines wherein each HCP has a definite role in this ever-changing scenario. Mental and physical well-being of HCPs is an integral part of successful management of patients. We present our experience in managing 143 patients during the lockdown period in India.Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications. All rights reserved.

2.
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery ; 65(1):163-166, 2023.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-2241950
3.
Radiol Case Rep ; 17(8): 2589-2593, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1878359

ABSTRACT

A 68-year-old man received hemodialysis (HD) for the treatment of end-stage renal failure for 6 years. Five years prior to carotid artery stenting (CAS), a neck ultrasound performed to screen for carotid atherosclerosis revealed an asymptomatic right internal carotid artery stenosis. One month prior, the stenotic lesion progressed to 74% by cerebral angiography; therefore, CAS was performed. To evaluate the influence of right internal carotid artery stenosis on the intradialytic cerebral circulation and oxygenation, cerebral regional oxygen saturation (rSO2) at bilateral forehead was measured using the INVOS 5100c oxygen saturation monitor (Covidien Japan, Japan) during HD before and after CAS. Before CAS, right cerebral rSO2 was maintained during HD, whereas left cerebral rSO2 gradually increased from the initiation to end of HD. However, the differences of intradialytic cerebral rSO2 changes between bilateral sides disappeared after CAS. In the present case, before CAS, the intradialytic increase in left cerebral rSO2 might reflect the increase in the left cerebral blood flow to compensate for the ultrafiltration-associated decreases in the right cerebral blood flow and perfusion pressure. Furthermore, the preserved right cerebral rSO2 before CAS might reflect the mechanism maintaining the right cerebral blood flow from the collateralized circle of Willis during HD. Throughout our experience, cerebral oxygenation monitoring during HD might disclose intradialytic changes in cerebral blood flow distribution between the ipsilateral and contralateral side in HD patients with carotid artery stenosis.

4.
Curr. Clin. Neurol. ; : 93-104, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1664450

ABSTRACT

Acute stroke treatment continues to evolve with optimization of systemic intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for intracranial large vessel occlusion (LVO). Neurointerventional techniques to achieve reperfusion in acute LVO stroke initially involved local intra-arterial infusion of thrombolytic agents. The subsequent development of MT devices has resulted in more complete and faster arterial recanalization while maintaining patient safety. Today, MT is standard of care for LVO stroke up to 24 h from last known well. In this chapter, we discuss various endovascular recanalization techniques for LVO stroke with illustrative cases.

5.
J Vasc Surg ; 75(5): 1670-1678.e2, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1568903

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the trends of carotid revascularization (endarterectomy [CEA], transfemoral carotid artery stenting [TFCAS]) for symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis before, during, and after the end of the first lockdown in 2020 in France. METHODS: Nationwide data were provided by the French National Hospital Discharge database (Programme de Médicalisation des Systèmes d'Information). We retrospectively analyzed patients admitted for CEA or TFCAS in all French public and private hospitals during a 9-month period (January-September) in 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020. Procedures were identified using the French Common Classification of Medical Procedures. Stenoses were considered symptomatic in the presence of stroke and/or transient ischemic attack codes (according to the International Classification of Diseases-Tenth Revision) during the stay, and asymptomatic in the absence of these codes. Hospitalization rates in 2020 were compared with the rates in the same period in the 3 previous years. RESULTS: Between January and September 2020, 12,546 patients were hospitalized for carotid artery surgery (CEA and TFCAS) in France. Compared with the 3 previous years, there was a decrease in hospitalization rates for asymptomatic (-68.9%) and symptomatic (-12.6%) CEA procedures in April, starting at the pandemic peak concomitant with the first national lockdown. This decrease was significant for asymptomatic CEA (P < .001). After the lockdown, while CEA for asymptomatic stenosis returned to usual activity, CEA for symptomatic stenosis presented a significant rebound, up 18.52% in August compared with previous years. Lockdown also had consequences on TFCAS procedures, with fewer interventions for both asymptomatic (-60.53%) and symptomatic stenosis (-16.67%) in April. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a severe decrease for all interventions during the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in France. However, the trends in the postlockdown period were different for the various procedures. These data can be used to anticipate future decisions and organization for cardiovascular care.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Carotid Stenosis , Endarterectomy, Carotid , Endovascular Procedures , Stroke , COVID-19/epidemiology , Carotid Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Carotid Stenosis/epidemiology , Carotid Stenosis/therapy , Communicable Disease Control , Constriction, Pathologic/complications , Endarterectomy, Carotid/adverse effects , Endarterectomy, Carotid/methods , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Humans , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Stents , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
6.
World Neurosurg ; 145: 356-359, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-850856

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a rapid screening method for COVID-19 detection is needed to decide the appropriate strategy to treat stroke patients. In acute ischemic stroke treatment, the efficacy and safety of emergent carotid artery stenting (eCAS) for hyperacute ischemic stroke (hAIS) due to internal carotid artery stenosis (ICS) have not been sufficiently established. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 71-year-old man with hAIS caused by severe ICS was treated via intravenous alteplase infusion. The patient underwent screening for COVID-19 by the loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay shortly after arrival at our institution. The LAMP result was obtained within 90 minutes, during intravenous alteplase infusion, and turned out to be negative. The symptom of hemiplegia worsened during alteplase infusion, and he, therefore, underwent eCAS after administration of aspirin (200 mg). Recanalization was achieved successfully by eCAS, and dual antiplatelet therapy and argatroban were administrated following eCAS. Hemorrhagic complications or restenosis/occlusion of the carotid artery were not observed. He was discharged without neurologic deficits 15 days following eCAS. Because of the rapid negative diagnosis for COVID-19 using the LAMP method, eCAS could be performed following standard procedures, along with infectious defense, without delay. CONCLUSIONS: This case report suggests that eCAS for hAIS due to ICS following intravenous alteplase can be an effective treatment, along with appropriate antiplatelet medication and management in select patients. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the LAMP assay for COVID-19 detection might be a suitable diagnostic strategy preceding stroke treatment because of the rapid turnaround time.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , Carotid Stenosis/surgery , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Ischemic Stroke/drug therapy , Ischemic Stroke/surgery , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques , Stents , Tissue Plasminogen Activator/therapeutic use , Aged , Arginine/analogs & derivatives , Arginine/therapeutic use , Carotid Stenosis/complications , Carotid Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Combined Modality Therapy , Hemiplegia/etiology , Humans , Ischemic Stroke/etiology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Pipecolic Acids/therapeutic use , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL